![]() Yes, i have made a few reviews and it takes a lot of time : unpacking the kit or AM resin set, taking a lot of pictures, sorting them to keep the best ones, writing the review, linking the pictures to the corresponding text. While we do receive review samples from some manufacturers and vendors, that doesn't nearly keep up with the frequency and volume of releases, so we're back to square one there.Īs for myself, when I used to do a kit review, it was to show the finished product-a complete build with a couple of build-up steps, and I would get a check in the mail.Īlthough, for the reasons I explain above, I am attracted to this subject, I think I would find I would find photographing and describing a complete detailed unbuilt kit review so tedious and time-consuming that I would lose my interest in the build itself. ![]() As an example, I have no interest whatsoever in the Early Stuka, and therefore will never buy the kit, so my reviewing it is not too likely. first and foremost, someone willing to take the time to do those reviews adequately (we have what I believe are reasonably high standards), as well as procuring the kits. There are a few issues with compiling reviews. This number includes kits, decals, AM items (both resin and P.E.), books, figures and tools, with a few oddball items thrown in as well. The current database listing states 1786 total reviews so far for LSP. for $136.99, a $34.00 mark-down, so it is tempting! Edited Octoby Gigant I figure I could get by without worrying the pricey after-market metal legs like I did with my Hobb圜raft Wildcat, which had a lot more bracing then the typical under/inner-wing-stored types:Īt this time, the 1/24th is on special in the U.S. Unlike some, I am attracted to fixed-gear aircraft, especially in the larger scale because of their increased bracing as well as support by a full-length wheel-pant, when so equipped. ![]() In that facet, they are essentially the same, detailed enough, but the larger scale still might make the job nicer in order to have "more to show" size-wise. ![]() United Kingdom settlement(Infinite Leave to Remain) and naturalization citizenship test and exam.As a comparison, here are the ones for the 1/32 versionįor some reason you completely understood what I was looking for, and just like you said, except for minor details, basically it is simply the 1/32 kit made larger, which for my money, except for the 1/24th's decal markings and recommended paint scheme, might not be worth the differenceĪs for the landing gears, I would be looking at exposing a gear strut, etc., by carefully carving a panel off the pant-leg. United States Citizenship Forms and Application King Tiger Henschel, Stuka, MIG-21 MF, Hellcat, Sherman 2408Ĭanadian Citizen Exam US Citizenship Practice TestĮxam Questions of Citizenship Test of Canadaĭiscount Handbags and Purses Air Conditioning Parts for Cars All Rights Reserved.ġ4191 NASCAR Racing, gift stores, Diecast Models:Ĩ1497 Hobby Mater Tiger I One Tank M1A1 HA Abrams Die-cast Models, Dive Bomber Ju-87, F-104, The 'B2' on the landing gear shows its remarkable owner: Hans Ulrich Rudel.Ĭopyright © 2004-2022. It was in this warplane that Hans Ulrich Rudel made his remarkable record of more than 500 Soviet tanks destroyed. The cannon proved to be a deadly and effective weapon. The Ju 87 G-1 was designed in 1942 as an antitank weapon and was characterized by the installation of two 37 mm BK 3.7 cannons beneath its wings. More than 5,700 of these bombers were produced. Initially designed in 1933, the Ju 87 Stuka remained in production until 1944. Hobby Master's Air Power Series introduces Ju 87 G-1 Stuka 'Tank Buster', one of the most widely used combat planes in the entire German aeronautical arsenal. Your location: Product Details - Ju 87 G-1 Stuka Tank Buster No.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |